2014-06-23 18:39 GMT+02:00 Vik Fearing <vik.fear...@dalibo.com>: > On 06/23/2014 06:21 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I found only one problem - first patch introduce a new property > >> CONNECTION_LIMIT and replace previously used "CONNECTION LIMIT" in > >> documentation. But "CONNECTION LIMIT" is still supported, but it is not > >> documented. So for some readers it can look like breaking > compatibility, but > >> it is false. This should be documented better. > > > > Yeah, I think the old syntax should be documented also. > > Why do we want to document syntax that should eventually be deprecated? >
It is fair to our users. It can be deprecated, ok, we can write in doc - this feature will be deprecated in next three years. Don't use it, but this should be documentated. Pavel > > > See, e.g., what we do for COPY. > > Exactly. We're still carrying around baggage from 7.2! > > Backward compatibility: yes. > Backward documentation: no. > -- > Vik >
