Philip Warner wrote: > At 10:03 PM 23/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >It is much cleaner to just duplicate the entire API so you don't have > >any limitations or failure cases. > > We may still end up using macros in pg_dump to cope with cases where off_t > & fseeko are not defined - if there are any. I presume we would then just > revert to calling fseek/ftell etc.
Well, we have fseeko falling back to fseek already, so that is working fine. I don't think we will find any OS's without off_t. We just need a little smarts. Let me see if I can work on it now. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
