On 06/02/2014 10:40 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > Tom's point goes back to what I was trying to drive at originally- > people should have to ask for this. Perhaps we can provide a way for > them to ask which is explicit enough that they understand "this might > not do exactly what you think it does", akin to what happens today with > a drop-and-recreate-everything approach. 'CASCADE' might not be > sufficient to meet that, maybe 'CASCADE REBUILD' or something?
I think CASCADE is sufficient; what else could a user mean by ALTER TABLE ... CASCADE? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
