On 2014-06-02 10:48:02 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 06/02/2014 10:40 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Tom's point goes back to what I was trying to drive at originally- > > people should have to ask for this. Perhaps we can provide a way for > > them to ask which is explicit enough that they understand "this might > > not do exactly what you think it does", akin to what happens today with > > a drop-and-recreate-everything approach. 'CASCADE' might not be > > sufficient to meet that, maybe 'CASCADE REBUILD' or something? > > I think CASCADE is sufficient; what else could a user mean by ALTER > TABLE ... CASCADE?
"Please also change the table's children". Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
