On 06/04/2014 11:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we could possibly ship 9.4 without fixing this, but it would be imprudent. Anyone think differently? Of course, if we do fix this then the door opens for pushing other initdb-forcing fixes into 9.4beta2, such as the LOBLKSIZE addition that I was looking at when I noticed this, or the pg_lsn catalog additions that were being discussed a couple weeks ago.
It certainly seems that if we are going to initdb anyway, let's do it with approved features that got kicked (assuming) only because they would cause an initdb.
JD
regards, tom lane
-- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc Political Correctness is for cowards. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers