David G Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > If we are planning on keeping this rule, which it seems like at least a few > people feel is too stringent, maybe we can consider releasing an Alpha > version and communicate the expectation that an initdb will be required to > go from the alpha to beta1. Then hopefully, but not certainly, no initdb > needed once in the beta phase. Basically convert beta1 into an alpha with > that single policy/expectation change.
I think that would just amount to adding a month of dead time in what is already a very long beta cycle. Our past experience with releasing things called "alphas" has been that people don't test them. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers