On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-06-24 15:23:54 +0430, Soroosh Sardari wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Soroosh Sardari <soroosh.sard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I check this problem with a virgin source code of > > > > postgresql-9.3.2. So the bug is not for my codes. > > > > > > > By the way, following code has two different output and it is > > > > weird. > > > > > > I can confirm that I see the difference in 9.3.2, and that I don't > > > see the difference in 9.3.4. Upgrade. > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ > > > > > > There's really no point in reporting a possible bug on a version > > > with known bugs which have already had fixes published. > > > > > > -- > > > Kevin Grittner > > > EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > > > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > > > > > > > > wow, it's arch-dependent. > > in the 32-bit compiled of PG9.3.2 the code has same output and in 64-bit > > binary of same code output is different!! > > > > The problem is not about the sql code I posted in the last email. Problem > > could be different in any architecture, > > In 32-bit or 64-bit architecture adding a char array of length 20 to > > PageHeaderData cause error in regression test. > > You likely didn't adapt SizeOfPageHederData. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund > > -- > Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services > #define SizeOfPageHeaderData (offsetof(PageHeaderData, pd_linp)) I think ,the macro does not need any change!
