Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-06-26 14:13:07 -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Surely it had better be a read barrier as well?
> I don't immediately see why it has to be read barrier? Hoisting a load
> from after the release into the locked area of code should be safe?
No doubt, but delaying a read till after the unlocking write would
certainly not be safe.
AFAICT, README.barrier completely fails to define what we think the
semantics of pg_read_barrier and pg_write_barrier actually are, so if
you believe that a write barrier prevents reordering of reads relative to
writes, you'd better propose some new text for that file. It certainly
doesn't say that today.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
