On 2014-06-28 15:41:46 +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-06-28 09:25:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > No, I think it's going to be *much* simpler than that. How about I > > take a crack at this next week and then either (a) I'll see why it's a > > bad idea and we can go from there or (b) you can review what I come up > > with and tell me why it sucks? > > Ok. I think that's going in the wrong direction (duplication of > nontrivial knowledge), but maybe I'm taking a to 'purist' approach > here. Prove me wrong :)
What I forgot: I'm also pretty sure that the more lockless stuff we introduce the more places are going to need acquire/release semantics... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
