On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rast...@huawei.com> wrote: > On 30 June 2014 22:50, Pavel Stehule Wrote: > > >I didn't find a related message. > >? > > I think there have been some confusion, the design idea were never rejected but yes there were few feedback/ concern, which I had clarified. Also some of the other concerns are already fixed in latest patch.
Simon has mentioned that exactly this idea has been rejected at PGCon 2 years back. Please refer that in below mail: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/bf2827dcce55594c8d7a8f7ffd3ab7713dde1...@szxeml508-mbx.china.huawei.com As far as I can see, you never came back with the different solution. Have you checked the discussion in Developer meeting notes. Please check the same at below link: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2012_Developer_Meeting#Autonomous_Transactions > So I wanted to have this patch in commitfest application, so that we can have a healthy discussion and rectify all the issues. > But now I see that this patch has already been moved to rejected category, which will put break on further review. I believe ideally this patch should have been marked as "Returned with feedback" as you already got a feedback long back and never come up with solution for same. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
