Hi,

While reading through the Explicit Locking section of the manual today,
I felt the last paragraph of section 13.3.2. (Row-level Locks) might
merit its own subsection.  It talks about page-level locks as distinct
from table- and row-level locks.  Then again, it is just one paragraph,
so maybe this was deliberate and/or rejected before (though I couldn't
find prior discussion off-hand).  Proposed patch attached.


Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Berater
Tel.: +49 (2161) 4643-171
Fax:  +49 (2161) 4643-100
Email: michael.ba...@credativ.de

credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Hohenzollernstr. 133, 41061 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
index 12b7814..84501e0 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
@@ -1140,6 +1140,9 @@ ERROR:  could not serialize access due to read/write dependencies among transact
      will result in disk writes.
     </para>
 
+   <sect2 id="locking-pages">
+    <title>Page-level Locks</title>
+  
     <para>
      In addition to table and row locks, page-level share/exclusive locks are
      used to control read/write access to table pages in the shared buffer
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to