Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems to make sense. Barring objection, I will commit this > only in HEAD.
I'm inclined to think this is a slight improvement, just for the sake of consistency with peer level information. You probably already noticed, but the patch as submitted neglects to close the prior sect2 block before opening the new one. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
