On 2014-07-22 10:09:04 +0900, MauMau wrote: > >From: "Andres Freund" <and...@2ndquadrant.com> > >>On 2014-07-18 23:38:09 +0900, MauMau wrote: > >>>So, I propose a simple fix to change the LOG level to DEBUG1. I don't > >>>know > >>>which of DEBUG1-DEBUG5 is appropriate, and any level is OK. Could you > >>>include this in 9.2.9? > >> > >>Surely that's the wrong end to tackle this from. Hiding actual problems > >>is a seriously bad idea. > > > >No, there is no serious problem in the user operation in this situation. > >Server crash cannot be avoided, and must be anticipated. The problem is > >that PostgreSQL makes users worried about lots of (probably) unnecessary > >messages. > > Is there any problem if we don't output the message?
Yes. The user won't know that possibly gigabytes worth of diskspace aren't freed. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
