On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:07:34AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > If you have a user devoted to it, I suppose that's true. I still > > > think it shouldn't get munged together like that. > > > > Why do we need to treat only replication commands as special ones and > > add new parameter to display them? > > One difference is that replication commands are internally generated > commands. Do we anywhere else log such internally generated > commands with log_statement = all?
Good point --- we do not. In fact, this is similar to how we don't log SPI queries, e.g. SQL queries inside functions. We might want to enable that someday too. Could we enable logging of both with a single GUC? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
