Amit, * Amit Kapila (amit.kapil...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > Regarding this, I'm generally in the camp that says to just include it > > in 'all' and be done with it- for now. > > Okay, but tomorrow if someone wants to implement a patch to log > statements executed through SPI (statements inside functions), then > what will be your suggestion, does those also can be allowed to log > with 'all' option or you would like to suggest him to wait for a proper > auditing system?
No, I'd suggest having a different option for it as that would be a huge
change for people who are already doing 'all', potentially. Adding the
replication commands is extremely unlikely to cause individuals who are
already logging 'all' any problems, as far as I can tell.
> Wouldn't allowing to log everything under 'all' option can start
> confusing some users without having individual
> (ddl, mod, replication, ...) options for different kind of statements.
I don't see logging replication commands under 'all' as confusing, no.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
