On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Oh, that worked in my machine, too, this time... I did something wrong. >> Sorry for the noise. > No problem, thanks for spending time testing.
Probably I got the similar but another problem. I set synchronous_standby_num to 2 and started up two synchronous standbys. When I ran write transactions, they were successfully completed. That's OK. I sent the SIGSTOP signal to the walreceiver process in one of sync standbys, and then ran write transactions again. In this case, they must not be completed because their WAL cannot be replicated to the standby that its walreceiver was stopped. But they were successfully completed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
