On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:57:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Maybe this is telling us it's not worth changing the representation, > and we should just go do something about the first_success_by threshold > and be done. I'm hesitant to draw such conclusions on the basis of a > single use-case though, especially one that doesn't really have that > much use for compression in the first place. Do we have other JSON > corpuses to look at?
Yes, that is what I was expecting --- once the whitespace and syntax sugar is gone in JSONB, I was unclear how much compression would help. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
