On 08/14/2014 11:13 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:57:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Maybe this is telling us it's not worth changing the representation, >> and we should just go do something about the first_success_by threshold >> and be done. I'm hesitant to draw such conclusions on the basis of a >> single use-case though, especially one that doesn't really have that >> much use for compression in the first place. Do we have other JSON >> corpuses to look at? > > Yes, that is what I was expecting --- once the whitespace and syntax > sugar is gone in JSONB, I was unclear how much compression would help.
I thought the destruction case was when we have enough top-level keys that the offsets are more than 1K total, though, yes? So we need to test that set ... -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
