On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Probably that's a good idea, but do we really need Author: tags? I >>> know we have those in a few places, but certainly not everywhere, and >>> as time goes by they tend to be less accurate reflections of who wrote >>> the latest code (as opposed to the original code). Furthermore, every >>> time we include them, it tends to increase the demand to add even more >>> of them because, hey, everybody likes to be acknowledged. >> >> Given that I'm the one named in it - nah, just drop it. > Updated patch updated without any Author tag.
I think that it's better to add an include guard like #ifndef RECEIVELOG_H #define RECEIVELOG_H ... #endif Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
