On 09/04/2014 09:31 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2014-09-04 15:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Wieck <j...@wi3ck.infoI think I like the COMMAND CONSTRAINT the best so far. I not, because when it will not be part of SQL, than parser in plpgsql will be more complex. You have to inject SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE
Making the COMMAND CONSTRAINT part of the core SQL parser was how I understood Hannu's idea. It would be horrible to tuck that feature away inside of a PL, rather than making it available to all PLs as well as applications, that use SQL directly (I think there still are two or three applications that do).
Regards, Jan -- Jan Wieck Senior Software Engineer http://slony.info -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
