On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:26:55AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > I have developed the attached patch which causes pg_upgrade to preserve > > the transaction epoch. I plan to apply this for PG 9.5. > > I would say this is a simple bug and should be back patched to 9.4 and > 9.3. We're only going to continue to get complaints from people > running into this.
Yes, I did think about that, but it seems like a behavior change. However, it is tempting to avoid future bug reports about this. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
