Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:24:17AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
>> I think the reason nobody's responding is because nobody has anything
>> significant to add. It's a behavior change from not-working to
>> working. Why wouldn't it be backpatched?
> OK, Greg seems to be passionate about this. Does anyone _object_ to my
> back-patching the epoch preservation fix through 9.3. Tom?
Not I. This is a data-loss bug fix, no? Why would we not back-patch it?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
