On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> wrote: > Re: Vik Fearing 2014-09-02 <5405d2d9.9050...@dalibo.com> >> > Uhm, are we agreed on the decision on not to backpatch this? I would >> > think this should have been part of the initial ALTER SYSTEM SET patch >> > and thus should be backpatched to 9.4. >> >> I think it belongs in 9.4 as well, especially if we're having another beta. > > My original complaint was about 9.4, so I'd like to see it there, yes.
ISTM that the consensus is to do the back-patch to 9.4. Does anyone object to the back-patch? If not, I will do that. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
