On 08/30/2014 07:16 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:

+       if (latency_limit)
+               printf("number of transactions above the %.1f ms latency limit: " 
INT64_FORMAT "\n",
+                          latency_limit / 1000.0, latency_late);
+

Any reason not to report a percentage here?

Yes: I did not thought of it.

Here is a v7, with a percent. I also added a paragraph in the documenation
about how the latency is computed under throttling, and I tried to reorder
the reported stuff so that it is more logical.

Now that I've finished the detour and committed and backpatched the changes to the way latency is calculated, we can get back to this patch. It needs to be rebased.

How should skipped transactions should be taken into account in the log file output, with and without aggregation? I assume we'll want to have some trace of skipped transactions in the logs.

- Heikki



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to