On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > I've started off by adding varied examples of the use of the existing > proposed syntax. I'll expand on this soon.
I spent some time today expanding on the details, and commenting on the issues around the custom syntax (exactly what it does, issues around ambiguous conflict-on unique indexes, etc). Also, "Challenges, issues" has been updated - I've added some "secondary concerns". These are non-contentious items that I think are of concern, and would like to highlight now. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
