On 10/17/14 4:15 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
Any particular reason why you couldn't have just done:
UPDATE table1 SET * = a,b,c, ...
That just looks wrong to me. I'd prefer (*) = .. over that any day.
UPDATE table1 t SET t = (SELECT (a,b,c)::t FROM...);
seems cleaner than the proposed syntax for row assignment. Tom
objected though IIRC.
I don't know about Tom, but I didn't like that:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5364c982.7060...@joh.to
.marko
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
