On 11/3/14 5:17 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> Please don't name anything "committs". That looks like a misspelling of >> something. >> >> There is nothing wrong with >> >> pg_get_transaction_commit_timestamp() >> >> If you want to reduce the length, lose the "get". >> > > I am fine with that, I only wonder if your definition of "anything" only > concerns the SQL interfaces or also the internals.
I'd be fine with commit_ts for internals, but not committs. One day, you'll need a function or data structure that works with multiple of these, and then you'll really be in naming trouble. ;-) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
