On 04/11/14 22:20, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 11/3/14 5:17 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Please don't name anything "committs". That looks like a misspelling of
something.
There is nothing wrong with
pg_get_transaction_commit_timestamp()
If you want to reduce the length, lose the "get".
I am fine with that, I only wonder if your definition of "anything" only
concerns the SQL interfaces or also the internals.
I'd be fine with commit_ts for internals, but not committs.
One day, you'll need a function or data structure that works with
multiple of these, and then you'll really be in naming trouble. ;-)
Hmm we use CommitTs in interfaces that uses CamelCase naming so I guess
commit_ts is indeed natural expansion of that.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
