On 11/08/2014 11:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
On 11/08/2014 09:26 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm not sure whether this is safe enough to back-patch, but it seems
like we should probably plan to back-patch *something*, because the
status quo isn't great either.
I confirm that Tom's patch does indeed fix my test case that produces
empty field names.
We should probably not backpatch it, as it is a behaviour change.
However, I do think we should add checks in composite_to_json and
hstore_from_record for empty field names, and error out if they are
found.
That seems like a pretty silly move: it wouldn't actually fix anything,
and it would break cases that perhaps are acceptable to users today.

What evidence do you have that it might be acceptable to today's users? The only evidence we have that I know of is Ross' complaint that indicates that it's not acceptable.

However,


We could reduce the risks involved by narrowing the cases in which
ExecEvalWholeRowVar will replace field names it got from the input.
I'd be inclined to propose:

1. If Var is of a named composite type, use *exactly* the field names
associated with that type.  (This avoids the need to possibly produce
RECORD outputs from a named-type Var, thus removing the Assert-weakening
issue.)

2. If Var is of type RECORD, replace only empty field names with aliases
from the RTE.  (This might sound inconsistent --- could you end up with
some names coming from point A and some from point B? --- but in practice
I think it would always be all-or-nothing, because the issue is whether
or not the planner bothered to attach column names to a lower-level
targetlist.)

        

I assume that's what you would propose for just the stable branches, and that going forward we'd always use the aliases from the RTE? Or maybe I'm not quite understanding enough which cases will be covered. To the extent that I do this sounds OK.

cheers

andrew


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to