On 2014-11-13 18:00:45 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
> > I'm happy to fix it either way (and fix it for 8.1, and back to.. what?
> > Postgres95?)
>
> Err. That might have come off poorly- I didn't mean that sarcastically
> but was really wondering how far back you test (or how far back we
> feel pg_dumpall needs to work against..). I was originally going to say
> 7.4, but then figured we might try to go back farther than even that
> and, well, Postgres95 is the oldest we have "easy" access to..
pg_dump currently errors out before 7.0:
/*
* We allow the server to be back to 7.0, and up to any minor release of
* our own major version. (See also version check in pg_dumpall.c.)
*/
fout->minRemoteVersion = 70000;
fout->maxRemoteVersion = (PG_VERSION_NUM / 100) * 100 + 99;
I do think it might be justifyable to bump that a bit.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
