Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> * Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
>> I'd agree for a new design, but I see too little to gain from changing it
>> now.
>> Today's behavior is fine.
> To clarify- you mean with the changes described- using usesuper for
> rolreplication and rolbypassrls instead of 'false' when dumping from
> older versions, correct?
I think Noah is arguing for leaving the pg_dumpall queries as they
stand. I disagree, but he's entitled to his opinion.
> Note for all- rolreplication goes back to 9.1. Are we thinking that
> change should be backpatched?
I would say it's not really worth back-patching.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
