On 18 November 2014 21:19, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Personally, I see this as natural extension of the conditional block control > which we already have for loops with CONTINUE WHEN and EXIT WHEN. This > basically extends it to any block and it seems quite natural to have it for > me... That's a reasonable argument to include it. I seem to share the same opinion with Andrew: its not going to hurt to include this, but its not gonna cause dancing in the streets either. I would characterize that as 2 very neutral and unimpressed people, plus 3 in favour. Which seems enough to commit. Perhaps I misunderstand, Andrew? Any objectors, say so now or I will commit tomorrow. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
