Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 11/19/2014 06:35 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> I seem to share the same opinion with Andrew: its not going to hurt to >> include this, but its not gonna cause dancing in the streets either. I >> would characterize that as 2 very neutral and unimpressed people, plus >> 3 in favour. Which seems enough to commit.
> That's about right, although I would put it a bit stronger than that. > But if we're the only people unimpressed I'm not going to object further. FWIW, I would vote against it also. I do not find this to be a natural extension of RAISE; it adds all sorts of semantic issues. (In particular, what is the evaluation order of the WHEN versus the other subexpressions of the RAISE?) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers