On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> And here is v10 which fixes conflicts with Heikki's WAL API changes (no >> >> changes otherwise). >> > >> > After some slight additional changes, here's v11, which I intend to >> > commit early tomorrow. The main change is moving the test module from >> > contrib to src/test/modules. >> >> When I specify the XID of the aborted transaction in >> pg_xact_commit_timestamp(), >> it always returns 2000-01-01 09:00:00+09. Is this intentional? > > Well, when a transaction has not committed, nothing is written so on > reading we get all zeroes which corresponds to the timestamp you give. > So yeah, it is intentional. We could alternatively check pg_clog and > raise an error if the transaction is not marked either COMMITTED or > SUBCOMMITTED, but I'm not real sure there's much point.
Maybe 0 should get translated to a NULL return, instead of a bogus timestamp. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
