On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:37:32AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > 2. It's not clear that we're going to have a particularly-impressive > list of major features for 9.5. So far we've got RLS and BRIN. I > expect that GROUPING SETS is far enough along that it should be > possible to get it in before development ends, and there are a few > performance patches pending (Andres's lwlock scalability patches, > Rahila's work on compressing full-page writes) that I think will > probably make the grade. But after that it seems to me that it gets > pretty thin on the ground. Are we going to bill commit timestamp > tracking - with replication node ID tracking as the real goal, despite > the name - as a major feature, or DDL deparsing if that goes in, as > major features? As useful as they may be for BDR, they don't strike > me as things we can publicize as major features independent of BDR. > And it's getting awfully late for any other major work that people are > thinking of to start showing up.
How bad is the 9.5 feature list going to be compared to the 9.4 one that had JSONB, but also a lot of infrastructure additions. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
