On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: >> If we care enough about that case to attempt the vacuum anyway then we >> need to do something about the error message; either squelch it or >> check for the existence of the tables before attempting to >> vacuum. Since there's no way to squelch in the server logfile, I think >> checking for the table is the right answer. > > Fair enough. I will come up with "checking for table before vacuum" > approach.
+1 for this approach. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
