* Robert Haas ([email protected]) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I thought my rewrite clarified this distinction pretty well. Maybe > >> I'm wrong? We're talking about the same paragraph. > > > > Sorry, I didn't express myself clearly. I think that you did get it > > right, but I would like to see that distinction also reflected in the > > actual sgml PARAMETER class tag. "expression" is way too generic here. > > I'm happy to see us change that if it makes sense, but I'm not sure > what that actually does.
If I'm following correctly, Peter's specifically talking about:
[ USING ( <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> ) ]
[ WITH CHECK ( <replaceable
class="parameter">check_expression</replaceable> ) ]
Where the USING parameter is 'expression' but the WITH CHECK parameter
is 'check_expression'. He makes a good point, I believe, as
"expression" is overly generic. I don't like the idea of using
"barrier_expression" though as that ends up introducing a new term- how
about "using_expression"?
This would need to be reflected below in the documentation which talks
about "expression" as the parameter to "USING", but I can certainly
handle cleaning that up.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
