On 29 January 2015 at 04:00, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: >> > If I'm following correctly, Peter's specifically talking about: >> > >> > [ USING ( <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> ) ] >> > [ WITH CHECK ( <replaceable >> > class="parameter">check_expression</replaceable> ) ] >> > >> > Where the USING parameter is 'expression' but the WITH CHECK parameter >> > is 'check_expression'. He makes a good point, I believe, as >> > "expression" is overly generic. I don't like the idea of using >> > "barrier_expression" though as that ends up introducing a new term- how >> > about "using_expression"? >> > I've gone ahead and made this minor change. >
Don't forget the ALTER POLICY page. This and some of the other things being discussed on this thread ought to be copied there too. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
