On 2015-01-10 17:58:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Given you got the error above, you used gcc. Have you used non-gcc > > compiler on hppa recently? I seem to recall you mentioning that that > > doesn't work sanely anymore? If so, perhaps we can just remove the !gcc > > variant? > > It still compiles, modulo some old and uninteresting warnings, but linking > the postgres executable fails with > > usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: > pg_compiler_barrier_impl (code) > make[2]: *** [postgres] Error 1
Ick, that one is my failure. > Curiously, there are no compiler warnings about "reference to undeclared > function", which is odd because I see nothing that would declare that name > as a function or macro for non-gcc HPPA. Yea, that's odd. > But in any case, the fallback logic for compiler barriers evidently > still needs work. Will fix (or well, try). It broke due to the atomics patch. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
