Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2015-01-11 00:06:41 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: >> Ick, that one is my failure.
> Actually. It looks like I only translated the logic from barrier.h 1:1 > and it already was broken there. Hm, it looks like the current code > essentially is from 89779bf2c8f9aa480e0ceb8883f93e9d65c43a6e. There's a small difference, which is that the code actually worked as of that commit. I suspect this got broken by Robert's barrier-hacking of a few months ago. I don't think I've tried the non-gcc build since committing 89779bf2c8f9aa48 :-( > Unless somebody protests I'm going to introduce a generic fallback > compiler barrier that's just a extern function. Seems reasonable to me. An empty external function should do the job for any compiler that isn't doing cross-procedural analysis. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers