On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:05:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> > > wrote: > >> Sure, but the log isn't invisible. As mentioned one paragraph above, I > >> don't think it's likely to ever be noticed in the client code in the > >> cases where it happens in production. > > > Yes, that is my feeling as well. > > Meh. I still don't like it, but I guess I'm outvoted. Unless there are > further votes, what we have at this point is just: > > - elog(WARNING, "pgstat wait timeout"); > + ereport(LOG, (errmsg("using stale statistics instead of current > ones because stats collector is not responding"))); > > with no conditionality for pgstat_vacuum_stat vs. other callers.
That is satisfactory to me, too. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers