On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I am marking this as Ready For Committer, the patch is trivial and works >>> as expected, there is nothing to be added to it IMHO. >>> >>> The "=>" operator was deprecated for several years so it should not be too >>> controversial either. > >> Committed with a few documentation tweaks. > > Was there any consideration given to whether ruleutils should start > printing NamedArgExprs with "=>"? Or do we think that needs to wait?
I have to admit that I didn't consider that. What do you think? I guess I'd be tentatively in favor of changing that to match, but I could be convinced otherwise. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
