2015-03-10 19:02 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> writes: > > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Presumably we are going to change it at some point; maybe we > >> should just do it rather than waiting another 5 years. > > > +1 > > > It has been deprecated long enough that I don't see the point of waiting. > > Uh, just to clarify, this has nothing to do with how long the operator has > been deprecated. The issue is whether pg_dump should dump a function-call > syntax that will not be recognized by any pre-9.5 release, when there is > an alternative that will be recognized back to 9.0. > > BTW, I just noticed another place that probably should be changed: > > regression=# select foo(x => 1); > ERROR: 42883: function foo(x := integer) does not exist > LINE 1: select foo(x => 1); > ^ > HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You might > need to add explicit type casts. > LOCATION: ParseFuncOrColumn, parse_func.c:516 >
1. funcname_signature_string 2. get_rule_expr > > regards, tom lane >
