On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote:
>> This sounded familiar... I pointed out the same thing a while back and Tom
>> had some feedback on what to do about it:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23294.1384142...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> Translated into code I guess that this gives the attached patch.

Looks fine to me, so committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to