On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote:
>>> This sounded familiar... I pointed out the same thing a while back and Tom
>>> had some feedback on what to do about it:
>>>
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23294.1384142...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>
>> Translated into code I guess that this gives the attached patch.
>
> Looks fine to me, so committed.

Thanks for picking this up.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to