Andrew Gierth wrote: > >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> Yeah, possibly. The existing pg_dump coding dates from before we > Tom> had CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW. > > As it happens it does not; the issue came up originally because of a > hack I came up with, and I've never used any pg version so old it didn't > have CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW. Nor does it look like the change was ever > backpatched (or at least not that far). > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20986.1102296...@sss.pgh.pa.us Wow --- We've had CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW since 2002: commit 248c67d7ed505d98d3a94cd3954835255317ff16 Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon Sep 2 02:13:02 2002 +0000 CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW, CREATE OR REPLACE RULE. Gavin Sherry, Neil Conway, and Tom Lane all got their hands dirty on this one ... What is newer is the ability to add columns: commit ff1ea2173a92dea975d399a4ca25723f83762e55 Author: Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> Date: Sat Dec 6 23:22:46 2008 +0000 Allow CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW to add columns to the _end_ of the view. Robert Haas (Andrew's original post is from 2004) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
