On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> As it happens it does not; the issue came up originally because of a >> hack I came up with, and I've never used any pg version so old it didn't >> have CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW. Nor does it look like the change was ever >> backpatched (or at least not that far). > > Sorry, that's mere historical revisionism.
Can we please keep this a little more civil? Saying it that way implies bad faith. You could instead write "I think you are mistaken". -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
