> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the > > system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of > > like to see progress on that front. > > Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to > advocate. > OK, I'll try to design a new regression test policy that is independent from the system's policy assumption, like unconfined domain.
Please give me time for this work. Thanks, -- NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Frost [mailto:sfr...@snowman.net] > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 7:16 AM > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Kohei KaiGai; Robert Haas; Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平); 张元 > 超; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] One question about security label command > > Tom, > > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the > > system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of > > like to see progress on that front. > > Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to > advocate. > > Thanks, > > Stephen -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
