On 2015-03-18 15:59:52 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > Okay. Attached revision has a few tweaks that reflect the status of > int128/uint128 as specialized types that are basically only useful for > this optimization, or other similar optimizations on compilers that > either are GCC, or aim to be compatible with it. I don't think > Andreas' V9 reflected that sufficiently.
Given that we don't rely on C99, I don't think that actually matters. Lots of our platforms build on pre C99 compilers... I think it makes sense to say that this currently only tests for a gcc extension and might be extended in the future. But nothing more. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
