Tommi Maekitalo wrote:
And we would not be creating a new syntax, but just changing the semantics of an existing one to be schema-aware. Still an extension that should be noted in the docs, but less intrusive.But I like the "RENAME a.x to b.x"-syntax.
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org